A bit from the history of the term
The term "ontology" was introduced by a philosopher fromGermany by Rudolf Gocklenius. In the process of development, the concepts introduced into it repeatedly changed. In medieval times, trying to make up the doctrine of being, he was regarded as a philosophical proof of the truths in religion. With the onset of the New Age, the ontology in philosophy began to represent a part of metaphysics, which studies the supersensible structure of all that exists.
Today, ontology is the division of philosophy about being, the supersensible world and the world as a whole.
Thus, the terms "metaphysics" and "ontology"close to each other in value. For some time they were used as synonyms. Over time, the term "metaphysics" went out of use, and its place was rightly occupied by ontology.
Object of study in ontology
There are two main aspects - being and non-being, -the study of which deals with ontology in philosophy. For the philosophical comprehension of all existing in the world, the category of being acts as the initial one. Ontological study of the world involves the use of a whole system of philosophical categories, the main of which are the concepts of being and non-being.
Being is an all-encompassingreality, what exists, is in fact. The concept of "being" includes a world that exists in reality. It forms the basis of all phenomena and things, guarantees their availability. Non-existence is the absence, the unreality of everything that is concrete, real. Thus, ontology is the division of philosophy about being, being.
Origination and development of ontology
What stages of formation has an ontology passed inphilosophy? Philosophy as a science and the question of being arise simultaneously. For the first time he studied the philosopher of antiquity Parmenides. For him, being and thought were identical concepts. He also argued that being did not come from somewhere and destroy it is also impossible, it is immovable and will never end in time. Non-existence, in his opinion, does not exist.
Democritus held the view that all things are atoms, thus recognizing being and non-being.
Plato opposed the world of spiritual ideas and essences-that which represents true being, to the world of sensible things, which tend to change. He recognized both being and non-being.
Aristotle represented matter as "being in possibility."
In the teachings that arose in the Middle Ages,being understood God himself. With the onset of the New Time, ontology in philosophy treated being as the mind, the consciousness of man. The only, undoubted and true being were the person, her consciousness and needs, her life. It consists of such basic forms: the spiritual and material being of man, the being of things, the being of society (social). Such unity helps to present a common basis for everything that exists.
Philosophical and legal ontology
What is the essence of law in general, it is impossible to understand without understanding what the philosophical and legal ontology is.
The realities of everyday life are contrastedthe system of the normative-evaluative world, to which man obeys. It dictates to each person different rules and requirements - political, moral, legal. This system also introduces certain norms into the life world of everyone (for example, at what age can one attend school, take part in electoral processes, marry, be brought to administrative and criminal responsibility), prescribes certain norms of conduct.
Thus, the philosophical and legal ontology -it is a way of organizing and interpreting some aspects of social life and at the same time being a person. The existence of the law and the actual being have significant differences, because the legal existence provides for the performance of certain duties. A person must obey the laws adopted in society. Therefore, philosophical and legal ontology is a branch of science that has its own specifics. The existence of the law he regards as "being-duty". Law is a sphere of due, namely that which "visibly" does not exist, but whose reality is of great importance in the life of every representative of society.
Under the legal reality is also meanta system that exists within the framework of human being. It consists of elements, which are peculiar to the performance of certain functions. In fact, it is a superstructure that includes legal institutions, relations and consciousness.
</ p>
